Dickenson County Fair & Horse Show

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
541629090
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Haysi, VA, USA
Phone
2769268509
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fairs

Reported finances

Revenue
$70,907
Expenses
$87,288
Assets
$70,822
Liabilities
$20,637

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

People named in this filing

  • CHARLES HAY (CHAIRMAN)
  • HAROLD FULLER (VICE CHAIRMAN)
  • CASSIE O'QUINN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To educate, entertain and foster positive community through a range of programs, arts and exhibits.

What it reported doing in 2013

The mission of dickenson county fair & horse show is to educate, entertain and foster a positive community. Educationally, we have live animals through our 4-h program, agriculture and horticulture exhibits through our Virginia cooperative extension office and a gun safety trailer to teach children firearms safety. We also have a wide variety of locals who either compete in our arts and crafts competition or simply display many aspects of our appalachain culture. Our music is also a local expression of mountain music, allowing the youth of the area to enjoy our county's uniqueness and diversity

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -23.1%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -72% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.