Dick Hollander Charity Golf Inc Dba Dick Hollander Open
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462485204
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Rockville, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3015802397
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $53,449
- Expenses
- $54,564
- Assets
- $1,528
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSH AKMAN (PRESIDENT)
- JAKE AKMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOSH AKMAN (PRESIDENT)
- JAKE AKMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LISA AKMAN (TREASURER/SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Organize and manage an annual charity golf tournament where 100% of the net proceeds benefit the cure alzheimer's fund.
What it reported doing in 2015
The filer raised $73,184 of which $23,296 was expenses and $49,643 (of which $2,643 was paid from 2014 ending balance) was distributed to the cure alzheimer's fund (charitable organization with EIN 52-2396428). A balance of $1,528 was kept at the end of 2015 to be distributed to cure alzheimer's fund at a later time.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.9%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 91%; rating input score 91
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.1%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -53.5% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.9% of revenue deployed · 91% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $50K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2014 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.