Diana's Grove Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043841567
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2017
Forms available
Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Licking, MO, USA
Phone
4172591823
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adult, Continuing Education

Reported finances

Revenue
$-831
Expenses
$10
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PATRICIA STORM (PRESIDENT/TR)

People named in this filing

  • CYNTHIA JONES (SECRETARY)
  • PATRICIA STORM (PRESIDENT/TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of diana's grove center, inc is based on the belief of self discovery and self creation, a process that can be called individuation. Programs are offered for self realization, self actualization, and personal growth. These programs are targeted for the express purpose of building relationships and sharing your life with others. This personal growth is to actuate one's self to be more fully part of a community and more acutely present in all relationships with others. Workshops include the following areas: life changing insights, experiential learning, community arts leadership training to enable one to more effective and empowering in personal/professional relationships art of creating community through authentic exchange and healthy process the intention of the programs is to awaken the creative spirit, encourage one to think about identity and what one's life can be, develop interpersonal skills, effect change in whom one chooses to be. The center provides a physical spac

What it reported doing in 2017

There were no program service revenues in 2017 and the only reportable activity is the writeoff of junked equipment. There are no further activities and this is a final return.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -101.2%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -63.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: -21% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2012 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.