Diamond Path Elementary Pto

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270772643
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Apple Valley, MN, USA
Phone
9524237695
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$53,886
Expenses
$34,265
Assets
$63,856

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAYA SHOFFNER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JAYA SHOFFNER (PRESIDENT)
  • LESLIE LINDGREN (TREASURER)
  • KACEY HAMMOND (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The diamond path pto runs a variety of programs to support the diamond path school community. In 2025, we will hold community events such as family game night, family fun fest in the spring, and a fundraiser (a funrun) in fall 2025. We will also hold a family gym night in december 2025. Our organization may also hold additional events on school grounds to welcome prospective families to the school community, we also hold monthly meetings jan-may 2025, and september- november 2025. (no pto meetings are held during summer months or december of any given year.)

What it reported doing in 2024

We supported fields trips for all grade levels, provided over 6,000 in teacher enrichment funds, hosted 3 community events completely free of charge to attendees, allocated over 1,000 funds to playground enhancements, funded many special school projects and supported school patrol force of 130 students with field trips and enrichment funds.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 47%; rating input score 47
  • Program expense ratio: 74%; rating input score 74

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 36.4%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.86; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 48% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 47% of revenue deployed · 74% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.