Diamond Canyon Coyotes PTA PTA Arizona Congress of Parents and Teac
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 932622801
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Anthem, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6022791811
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $71,478
- Expenses
- $78,799
- Assets
- $48,445
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jessica Seiter (President)
- Sharlie Erb (Vice President)
- Kelsey Hanson (Vice President)
- Melanie Oropesa (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Jessica Seiter (President)
- Sharlie Erb (Vice President)
- Kelsey Hanson (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Diamond Canyon Coyotes PTA is a non-profit organization which supports Diamond Canyon Students in the Deer Valley Unified School District. Through-out the school year, we sponsor several family events and student programs for our school families. We hope that all of our families will get involved by attending PTA events; helping children participate in our educational programs; volunteering time and talents in the classroom, at the school, and for PTA-supported activities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Diamond Canyon PTA is a non-profit organization which supports Diamond Canyon Students in the Deer Valley Unified School District. Through-out the school year, we sponsor several family events and student programs for our school families. We hope that all of our families will get involved by attending PTA events; helping children participate in our educational programs; volunteering time and talents in the classroom, at the school, and for PTA-supported activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 3
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 3.1%; rating input score 3
- Program expense ratio: 2.8%; rating input score 3
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.2%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -66.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -55.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 3.1% of revenue deployed · 2.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.