Diabetes Solution of Oklahoma
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731590673
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4058434386
- Rating
- 95
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Specifically Named Diseases
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $197,322
- Expenses
- $275,762
- Assets
- $141,963
- Liabilities
- $25,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- KIM BOAZ-WILSON (Executive Dir.)
- MIKE COOK (Director)
- SCOTT FLETCHER (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To aid, assist and educate individuals by offering a variety of programs and resources to help reduce the incidents of diabetes and improve the quality of life for people with diabetes.
What it reported doing in 2024
Camp endres--medical and educational residential camps for children ages 3 through 18. These camps served approximately 70 youth with diabetes for a variety of programs and lengths of time based on children's ages to promote education and facilitate learning self-care management strategies in a fun and safe environment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 94.7%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -39.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $261K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.