Diabetes Alliance of Idaho Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
825078317
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Boise, ID, USA
Phone
2089727945
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$27,297
Expenses
$66,580
Assets
$45,555
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Richard Mussler-Wright (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Dorothy Plaza (Chair)
  • Ashley Rundle (Vice Chair)
  • Nichole Telford (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To reduce the burden of diabetes in Idaho by advancing prevention, improving access to care and self-management education, and fostering collaboration among healthcare providers, community organizations, and public health partners.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Diabetes Alliance of Idaho awarded a grant to Kaniksu Community Health to support the launch of a new Diabetes Prevention Program, expanding access to evidence-based diabetes prevention services in a rural and underserved region of Idaho. The program enrolled eight participants and achieved a 75% retention rate, demonstrating strong engagement in its inaugural cohort. Early outcomes indicate positive health impacts, with three participants reporting A1c reductions following follow-up with their primary care providers; additional participants have completed or scheduled A1c testing. Participants also demonstrated increased awareness of physical activity, active engagement in class content, and meaningful peer discussions. The program further contributed to improved coordination and cohesion between participants and their healthcare teams, supporting sustained lifestyle change and diabetes risk reduction.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 60.1%; rating input score 60

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -143.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.9%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 49.8% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -110.4% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -60.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 60.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 8 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.