Dfeet Breast Cancer Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 753064580
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Galveston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4097715574
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $154,830
- Expenses
- $222,266
- Assets
- $344,112
- Liabilities
- $43,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- ANGELA HOUGHTON MD (Vice Chair)
- KATHY LINDSEY (Director)
- RACHEL FUENTES (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Help uninsured and underserved galveston county women obtain free screening mammograms. During the fiscal year 2017/2018, d'feet provided funding for 737 clinical screening mammograms. Abnormal screening results on these mammograms led to 207 diagnostic mammograms, 272 diagnostic breast ultrasounds, 27 biopsies and 8 surgical consults. There were 5 new breast cancer cases diagnosed during the year. D'feet staff and gchd public health nurses provide extensive community outreach through participation in health fairs and community events during the year, as well as on site recruitment in underserved areas of the county.
What it reported doing in 2017
Help uninsured and underserved galveston county women obtain free screening mammograms. During the fiscal year 2017, d'feet provided funding for 870 clinical screening mammograms. Abnormal screening results of these mammograms led to 299 diagnostic mammograms, 407 diagnostic breast ultrasounds, 59 biopsies and 22 surgical consults, and resulted in the diagnosis of 15 breast cancers.d'feet staff and gchd public health nurses provide extensive community outreach through participation in health fairs and community events during the year, as well as on site recruitment in underserved areas of the county.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -43.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.55; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $210K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.