Developmental Services Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680477350
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- San Marcos, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7607433714
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $194,955
- Expenses
- $173,214
- Assets
- $53,597
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STACY SULLIVAN (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- MATT MOUER (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STACY SULLIVAN (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- DENNIS MATTSON (BOARD MEMBER)
- MATT MOUER (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The developmental services network (dsn) is an association of California organizations. All of which serve persons with developmental disabilities. Dsn promotes a support system for these organizations through dissemination of information, training, leadership and professionalism within the field.
What it reported doing in 2025
The development services network (dsn) holds meetings where training is provided to enhance dsn members' ability to serve their clients. In addition, members introduce issues that affect their ability to carry out their missions. Dsn hosts a website that will serve as a source of valuable information for its members, and sponsor a list serve where members can dialogue on issues that affect them. Dsn leadership meet with California's department of health services and developmental services to represent dsn membership and to collaborate on resolving issues that confront its members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -10.3% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.