Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 381459371
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Detroit, MI, USA
- Phone
- 3139934700
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,971,697
- Expenses
- $24,511,691
- Assets
- $17,867,504
- Liabilities
- $2,927,968
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR CHAD AUDI (PRESIDENT)
- DARLENE OWENS (VICE PRESIDENT OF TREATMENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DR CHAD AUDI (PRESIDENT): $404,831 total reported compensation
- JAPETH AGBOKA (PROGRAM MANAGER): $127,352 total reported compensation
- DARLENE OWENS (VICE PRESIDENT OF TREATMENT): $126,464 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Detroit rescue mission ministries is a non-profit organization committed to sharing the gospel of the love of jesus christ by providing hope to homeless, abused, and disadvantaged men, women, and children, rebuilding lives through ministry to body, soul, and spirit.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided permanent supportive housing through cornerstone to more than 100 chronically homeless men whose disabilities, including physical, developmental, cognitive, mental health, and addiction related challenges, had created barriers to stable housing. Residents could remain as long as needed or until they were able to move into housing of their choice.based on individualized plans designed to help residents maintain income, access needed services, and secure housing stability, the following services were provided: mental health care, medical and dental care, and substance abuse treatment and recovery services. (continued on schedule o)we also helped residents find employment, access mainstream income resources, and transition to community-based, independent housing.working families, working homes, another permanent supportive housing (psh) program, provided homes in residential neighborhoods for households led by adults who were homeless despite being employed. The program enabled families to live in a private home until they secured independent permanent housing or chose to relocate.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.8%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 76.9%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $1,458.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.5%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.8% of revenue deployed · 76.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $18.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $405K · 15 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1M reported
- Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.