Destress the Community

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
862061809
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Culpeper, VA, USA
Phone
5404038125
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$100
Expenses
$0
Assets
$595
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sandra Thomas (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Sandra Thomas (CEO)
  • Melissa Hargett (Secretary)
  • Kiri Fellabaum (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We had online yoga events, meditations and a few speaking engagements. We went and visited a few parks as well this past year. We did a few online vision workshops and one in person. We did free zoom yoga classes to get the community involved. We did a few facebook fundraisers to raise money and educational awareness on educating and advocating for individuals to destress. That is where the $100 came from.

What it reported doing in 2024

Yoga to the community had a series in the park with multiple teachers. This was over a 6 week period had over 40 people ; online yoga we had a total of 10 over the year ranging for 4 to 8 people each time. There was a yoga movement piece, meditation piece and an educational piece; online vision board for destressing had 3 of them total of 15 people and one in person vision board in person 5 people

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -113.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -30.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.