Destiny International Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
731506433
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Tulsa, OK, USA
Phone
9182899500
Rating
95
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Protestant
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$164,012
Expenses
$161,448
Assets
$9,535
Liabilities
$1,379

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Steve Andrew (President)
  • Rita Andrew (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Steve Andrew (President)
  • Rita Andrew (Vice President)
  • Stewart Andrew (Trustee)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Proclaim gospel of jesus christ.

What it reported doing in 2025

Destiny International's primary purpose of the futherance of the gospel of Jesus Christ was achieved through the following ministry. Destiny International trained full-time mission students through teaching in Victory World Mission Training Center.Destiny trained church leaders in Malaysia, Bolivia, China, Vietnam, and Combodia, as well as the distribution of humanitarian aid.Destiny International also had works in schools & orphanages in the foreign countries of Vietnam and Burma. Destiny International assists with hospital ministry and in feeding programs for the less fortunate.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 99
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98.4%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.6%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 34.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 98.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $161K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.