Destination Angels Camp Development Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452929129
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Angels Camp, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2095594781
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $52,484
- Expenses
- $69,009
- Assets
- $65,262
- Liabilities
- $35,336
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
People named in this filing
- SCOTT BEHIEL (DIRECTOR)
- LISA BOULTON (DIRECTOR)
- KATHY COLLINS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The specific purpose of this organization is to foster angels camp through economic development to create a vibrant business environment rich in appeal for angels camp residents, businesses and visitors, with an emphasis on strengthening the historical downtown as a critical element in the greater community fabric. The purpose will be achieved through: 1) economic development and business retention and recruitment activities and programs in angels camp, working in conjunction with community organizations, city officials responsible for economic development and with the city council; and 2) destination development including the implementation of the "angels camp branding, development & marketing action plan" (november 2008) with the goal of developing angels camp into the mountain sports capital in the sierra Nevada mountains.
What it reported doing in 2016
Business attraction, business retention, and destination development to improve the economic conditions of angels camp and the surrounding area, including the upgrade of tourism infrastructure and outdoor sports-related businesses to grow angels camp's key year-round industry.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43.6%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 33.2%; rating input score 33
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -31.5%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.54; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -33.8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -29.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 43.6% of revenue deployed · 33.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2014 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.