Desert Thunder Aquatics Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860823933
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Chandler, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 4802097584
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Swimming & Other Water Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $109,771
- Expenses
- $99,795
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT LATHROP (PRESIDENT)
- ANDREW SCHNELLER (VICE PRESIDENT UNTIL SEPT 2025)
People named in this filing
- SCOTT LATHROP (PRESIDENT)
- ANDREW SCHNELLER (VICE PRESIDENT UNTIL SEPT 2025)
- KEVIN BAUERLE (BOARD MEMBER UNTIL MARCH 2025)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To instruct, train and coach swimmers of all ages.
What it reported doing in 2025
Desert thunder's program is built on a developmental coaching philosophy. Our training programs are tailored to the physical and emotional development of the swimmer and incorporate state of the art applications of research in the areas of biomechanics, neurology, and exercise physiology. Our approach is a highly motivational one which focuses on individual improvement and relies on a cooperative effort between the coaching staff, the swimmer and the swimmer's parents.we also, with the help of volunteers, organized and conducted local meets and mini-meets. Swimmers form the organization participate in these meets and in meets held by similar organizations. Employees of the organization coached the swimmers at these meets. Club swimmers compete in state, regional and sectional meets.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.5%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 76.2%; rating input score 76
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.1%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 31.7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -25.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -23.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.5% of revenue deployed · 76.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $76K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.