Desert Harbor Doberman Rescue of AZ

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271352468
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6024928139
Rating
95
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Reported finances

Revenue
$82,788
Expenses
$76,465
Assets
$186,811
Liabilities
$1,643

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Christy Cole (President/ED)

People named in this filing

  • Christy Cole (President/ED)
  • Lisa Futo (Treasurer)
  • Alyson Teply (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Desert Harbor Doberman Rescue of Arizona (DHDR) is Arizonas oldest 501(c)(3) nonprofit Doberman rescue organization. Founded on January 6, 2009, our mission is (1) to rescue placeable purebred Dobermans in Arizona, evaluate and treat them, and place them in loving forever homes, (2) to act as an educational resource to the community regarding Dobermans, Doberman health, and raising Dobermans, and (3) network Dobermans in need, supporting other organizations that are looking to also find homes for Dobermans.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025 we took in 81 Dobermans and had 64 adoptions. Year over year, we took in 10 fewer puppies, and in 2025 transferred 10 puppies out (variance of 20), which is one of the main reasons for the lower intake and adoption volume. We predicted this possibility in 2024. Our limited number of fosters also impacted our ability to keep up with previous year intake numbers. We continue to see more behavior case requests than ever before; it is a known widespread issue across rescues and behavior professionals.We continue to focus on cross-posting and emphasizing our shift to be a networker and connector. We cross post at least 500 Dobermans each year. We have sent 24 bags of food. We have done 17 spay/neuter or vet visits ($4725.92) for community Dobermans in 2025, and are already off to a strong start in 2026 as well.With a ton of work last year, we re-launched our email marketing/education program and continued it into 2025.We continue to expand our trainer referral list in alignment with our Humane Hierarchy philosophy; it is great to have so many aligned partners to refer people to. We also attended the Aggression in Dogs conference to gain the latest learnings. We launched a partnership with Pet Academy to provide all our adopters with 30 days of free live-trainer text message support. 100% of our adopters are opting-in, and 80% are engaging with the text support.We took all year to revamp our apparel and goods, re-launching with Printful. This allows us more transparency into the products, and higher quality. We have set our profit at 0, with the intention for this to be a brand awareness play, not a revenue stream. Over the summer DHDR was contacted by an overwhelmed owner who had taken on and bred more Dobermans than he could handle, then lost his job. He had 31 Dobermans in his home. The owner loved his dogs dearly, but was overextended. Unlike other headline-catching cases, this owner was highly collaborative with DHDR. Our team conducted behavior and wellness evaluations on all of the Dobermans, documenting photos and each pup's needs in a playbook. With this volume of Dobermans all at once, some with, we had to get creative. DHDR partnered with Arizona Humane Society and Almost There. Between our organizations, over the course of two months, we were able to coordinate solutions that got 28 dogs into rescue.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 91%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 98.6%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.6%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.44; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 91% of revenue deployed · 98.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $75K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.