Desert Botanical Garden

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860136925
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Phoenix, AZ, US
Phone
480.941.3517
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Botanical Gardens, Arboreta and Botanical Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$30,218,299
Expenses
$27,488,617
Assets
$86,738,251
Liabilities
$6,875,426

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

65 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANN STANTON (VICE PRESIDENT (UNTIL 5/22/25))
  • KENNETH SCHUTZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (UNTIL 9/30/25))

Highest reported compensation

  • KENNETH SCHUTZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (UNTIL 9/30/25)): $605,277 total reported compensation
  • MARGARET BURKE (EXECUTIVE VP & CFOO): $316,733 total reported compensation
  • MIKE REMEDI (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $249,252 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To advance excellence in education, research, conservation, and horticulture of desert plants of the world, with an emphasis on the Sonoran Desert.

What it reported doing in 2024

Horticulture - propagating & maintaining a living plant collection of over 50,000 desert plants with particular emphasis on those inhabiting the sonoran desert, many of which are endangered species. This program also works to preserve desert plant life outside of its collection by educating the public regarding the beauty, variety and fragility of desert plant life by displaying and interpreting its collection for the public at its garden in phoenix, az which in the current year attracted over 520,000 visitors from all over the world. Education - provides programming for children, adults, and educators that promote greater enjoyment, understanding and stewardship of the sonoran desert. (continued on schedule o)children's programming at the desert botanical garden promotes a scientifically and environmentally literate community through hands-on, nature-based learning, and garden staff and resources. These place-based experiences inspire a connection to the unique wonders of the sonoran desert, encourage conservation of the natural world, and ignite a life-long appreciation for the environment. Informal programs span the ages of infants to teenagers alongside their caregivers through inquiry-based investigations that incorporate art, science, music, and much more.in fy2025, the children and family team at desert botanical garden engaged more than 28,000 visitors through a diverse portfolio of educational programs and family-focused experiences. Collectively, these offerings advanced the garden's mission to connect people of all ages with the plants, people, and ecology of the sonoran desert.the cactus clubhouse served as a central hub for family engagement. Open from october 18 through may 17, thursday-sunday from 9:00 a.m. To 3:00 p.m., this nature-based play space welcomed over 18,000 visitors, including more than 12,000 children. Access to the clubhouse was included with general garden admission and membership, reinforcing the garden's commitment to inclusive, hands-on learning.an additional 6,000 visitors participated in children's education programming during free community days held in the binns pavilion. These programs were delivered in partnership with regional organizations such as Arizona game and fish, tempe public library, and phoenix herpetological sanctuary, strengthening community connections and expanding educational reach.the children and family department also collaborated with the events department to deliver educational programming during major garden events, including the plants and people of the sonoran desert festival, strange garden, and luminaria, integrating learning opportunities into high-attendance experiences.after a post-covid pause, dbg-led field trips resumed in fy2025, welcoming nearly 4,000 students and chaperones back to the garden for on-site learning. Summer camp continued to grow as a signature offering, with multiple camps held each week in june and 122 children ages 8-13 participating in immersive, hands-on experiences.ongoing weekly programming further extended engagement across seasons. Storytime activities, offered in the cactus clubhouse throughout the spring and summer, centered on sonoran desert flora and fauna and engaged 630 children and caregivers. Seedlings classes, designed for children ages 2-6 and their caregivers, promoted early nature-based play and reached more than 110 participants over a two-month period.equity and access remained a priority throughout the year. Through the caecom community pass program, the children's education team partnered with organizations serving underprivileged youth to provide free, facilitated days at the garden. Partners included atabey outdoors, boys and girls club, free arts for abused children of Arizona, and asu's migratory student summer academy, among others. These experiences positively impacted more than 500 children.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.6%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 72.7%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.16; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.2%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 9 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 73.6% of revenue deployed · 72.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 45 of 45 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $605K · 65 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $9.5M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.