Deschutes County 4-H Leaders Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 936028976
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Redmond, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5415486088
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development - Agricultural
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $140,601
- Expenses
- $86,967
- Assets
- $258,037
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHERYL KATZKE (PRESIDENT)
- DONNA GRUDT (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MORGAN HENSON (4-H AGENT)
- MEGAN SILVEY (SECRETARY)
- RACHEL ULUM (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The goal of 4-h is to develop citizenship, leadership, responsibility and life skills of youth through experiential learning programs and positive youth development approach.
What it reported doing in 2024
4-h activities
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 36
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 29%; rating input score 29
- Program expense ratio: 46.9%; rating input score 47
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 38.1%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.97; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 29% of revenue deployed · 46.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $41K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.