Des Moines Rhf Housing Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330402391
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Long Beach, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5622575100
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $444,475
- Expenses
- $459,382
- Assets
- $1,534,972
- Liabilities
- $3,176,634
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
36 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HARTMAN STUART J (PRESIDENT/CEO)
- DESAEGHER NORMA N (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- HARTMAN STUART J (PRESIDENT/CEO): $770,133 total reported compensation
- AMBERG ROBERT R (EXECUTIVE VP GEN COUNSEL): $530,647 total reported compensation
- ROSSELLO FRANK JR (CFO AND VP OF FINANCE): $488,122 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Des moines rhf housing, inc. Is a not-for-profit corporation formed in accordance with the not-for-profit statutes of the state of Iowa. The corporation was formed for the purpose of operating a 40 unit property known as Virginia park apartments located in des moines, Iowa, which provides housing for mobility impaired persons pursuant to section 811 of the national housing act, as amended.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 61
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.9%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 88.8%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.4%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.34; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.07; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 166%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.9% of revenue deployed · 88.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $408K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $770K · 36 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 228 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.