Deputy Sheriffs Association of Santa Clara County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800919458
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Jose, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4082951500
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Private Independent Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $543,489
- Expenses
- $662,565
- Assets
- $2,140,120
- Liabilities
- $-4,336
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KYLE HAYNES (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARCUS BARBOUR (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARCUS BARBOUR (PRESIDENT): $18,411 total reported compensation
- KYLE HAYNES (VICE PRESIDENT): $13,151 total reported compensation
- TIFFANY POYADUE (TREASURER): $9,205 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Labor association for santa clara county deputy service officers
What it reported doing in 2024
Negotiates contracts and provides legal representation to members for defense of job related offenses and infractions
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -21.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.23; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.2%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 358 of 14 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $18K · 11 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $164K reported
- Consistency: 9 of 10 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.