Deployus Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472818525
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Boston, MA, USA
Phone
6179175665
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Energy Resources Conservation and Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$31,977,569
Expenses
$22,685,164
Assets
$18,266,739
Liabilities
$4,841,417

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDREA S YODSAMPA (BOARD CHAIR/DIRECTOR/CEO)
  • ALEX BOZMOSKI (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANDREA S YODSAMPA (BOARD CHAIR/DIRECTOR/CEO): $415,382 total reported compensation
  • ALEX BOZMOSKI (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT): $352,235 total reported compensation
  • JENNIFER COPE (TREASURER/VP FINANCE): $290,951 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mobilize, coordinate, and strengthen the impact of the field of organizations advancing conservative clean-energy leadership and bipartisan decarbonization solutions.

What it reported doing in 2025

Deploy/us expanded its reach, capabilities, and impact in 2025. Deploy/us convened environmental civil society organizations and leaders to collaborate on thought leadership and opportunities for environmental-education initiatives; supported our fieldwide infrastructure focused on communications; supported the success of partner grantees with on-the-ground expertise and capacity; convened philanthropists for educational dialogues; and contributed to the educational missions of environmental and energy-focused civil society organizations by expanding direct grantmaking, supporting public communications, and supporting fieldwide learning, assessment and impact.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 87% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.1%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 93.2%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: $37.04 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 29.1%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 44.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 44.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 43.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.1% of revenue deployed · 93.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $21.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $415K · 17 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $138K reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 41 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 31 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.