Denver Botanic Gardens

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
840440359
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Official website data refreshed
Aug 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
Denver, CO, US
Phone
720-865-3500
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Botanical Gardens, Arboreta and Botanical Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$52,099,889
Expenses
$47,586,451
Assets
$24,951,866
Liabilities
$9,310,365

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

44 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER RILEY-CHETWYND (INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
  • BRIAN VOGT (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (THRU 3/25))

Highest reported compensation

  • JOHN CALDERHEAD (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $402,311 total reported compensation
  • JENNIFER RILEY-CHETWYND (INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $331,533 total reported compensation
  • JOHANNA KELLY (DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT): $273,367 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To connect people with plants and the natural world, inspiring appreciation and stewardship of the environment.

What it reported doing in 2025

Horticulture, science and conservation: denver botanic gardens is responsible for living plant collections and horticultural garden displays, which include more than 57,000 living plants, belonging to 10,000+ species and more than 36,000 accessions. Our wide range of gardens illustrate the connection between plants and people. Our diverse collections feature plants from all corners of the world, from the tropics to the tundra. Distinctive gardens define and celebrate our regional sense of place in our unique high altitude, semi-arid climate and geography. As an accredited museum, our diverse collections are used for education, research and pure enjoyment. Among our living collections reside two national collections registered with the national plant collections network (pcn): oaks (quercus) and alpines of the world. Scientific research is closely linked to everything at the gardens. The core motivation of our scientific work is to investigate and explain biodiversity patterns and processes. We actively conduct scientific research, serve as a resource of scientific expertise and work to train the next generation of scientists. Our programs include population monitoring, seed collection, genetic investigations for conservation or taxonomic clarification, habitat restoration, urban tree assessments and community science. The gardens documents plant and fungal diversity with a focus on the southern rocky mountain region through our collecting efforts. The kathryn kalmbach vascular plant herbarium houses more than 80,000 specimens while the sam mitchel herbarium of fungi houses over 20,000 well-curated specimens from the region. We accessioned our 100,000th specimen in 2024, and continue to expand our collections through targeted growth. The gardens trains the next generation of scientists through graduate student programs in collaboration with the university of Colorado at denver. Our expanded restoration studies examining seed mixes and influence of a warming climate on plant success through common garden studies continue with two active field sites. We launched a native plant materials program in partnership with the u.s. Bureau of land management. In addition, we analyzed genetic data on plants from multiple source locations growing in our common garden in order to better understand the influence of genetics and environment on success of restoration projects.the gardens' center for global initiatives is an example of the gardens' work around the globe. We continued our collaboration with instituto nacional de tecnologia agropecuaria (inta), argentina in 2025. This collaboration was developed to exchange information and capacity on propagation and research of native flora of both argentina, patagonia in particular, and the rocky mountain and plains regions of Colorado. In 2025 the center for global initiatives also stewards the exchange of knowledge, resources, and collaboration of national academy of sciences, institutes of botany throughout central asia and mongolia. The gardens' center for global initiatives conducted multiple plant exploration and collecting trips through international partnerships in kazakhstan, argentina and mongolia.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.9%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 88.6%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.37; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 82.9% of revenue deployed · 88.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 36 of 36 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $42.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $402K · 44 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5.6M reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.