Delta Stockton Humane Society & Society For The PR

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
941643496
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Stockton, CA, USA
Phone
2094054782
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Reported finances

Revenue
$414,769
Expenses
$674,798
Assets
$500,580
Liabilities
$429,212

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Maria Thompkins (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Richard Lopez (Board Member Interim Secretary)
  • Denise Lee (Board member)
  • Marci Waller (Board member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To protect and care for animals, adopt and maintain wellbeing especially those that are homeless or stray, to shelter homeless and stray animals and to educate the public to prevent crulty to animals

What it reported doing in 2025

ANIAML HEALTH AND WELFARE: Cleaning and maintaining animal facilities, bathing and grooming animals, treating animals with vaccinations, de-worming animals, walking dogs and socializing pets, taking in homeless stray animals and providing care including but not limited to adminestering medications, transporting animals to and from vet hospitals, bottle feeding abandoned kitten litters and preparing and maintaining animal health records. Microchiping and registering the microchips. Homeless vaccination and microchiping program, community outreach awareness, low income program, food bank for underprivileged and marginalized ANIMAL ADOPTION SERVICES: Matching pets with the right owner, showcasing pets to prospective owners, providing pet personality trait information to prospective adopters, maintaining pet health and background records, reviewing, approving and/or decling adoption applications.Adoption centers such as pet stores, fundraisers, outreach and events, offering adoption at reduced rates, participating events and media. PUBLIC EDUCATION AND AWERNESS: Educating the public about the need for spay/neutering, pet overpopulation crisis and responsible pet ownership, referring animal abuse calls to appropriate law enforcement, teachning owners about how to find bottle feed abandoned kittens, counseling customers on alternative ways taking and displaying lost pet information, handing out public educational materials and maintaining informational displays and giving shelter trours to groups. Outreach to county and local schools, pre-schools and univestities and to appropriately educate. Offering community service hours to the public.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 27
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 24.3%; rating input score 24
  • Program expense ratio: 15%; rating input score 15
  • Fundraising efficiency: $53.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -62.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.86; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 24.3% of revenue deployed · 15% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $101K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.