Delta Foundation for Rehabilitation and Research
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 916053685
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Snohomish, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3605682168
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $105
- Expenses
- $163,811
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRIS WALSH (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CHRIS WALSH (PRESIDENT)
- DONNA E WALSH (SECRETARY-TREASURER)
- CAROL L WALSH (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To identify those needs of people with acquired disability from traumatic brain injury that are not met by present social, medical and government programs and to develop and implement strategies for responding to those needs with the goal of providing the missing elements necessary to better assure the individual's ability to make the full transition from coma to community. Our reach extends to those individuals who have experienced traumatic brain injury and are medically and or categorically indigent.
What it reported doing in 2022
Community education and outreach including provision offunds to brain injury association of wa and brain injury foundation, to be used for corporate development and purchases of equipment for helping people with brain injuries.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 5.5%; rating input score 6
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -155,910.5%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 5.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2009 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 17 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.