Delta Alpha Boule Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
862483145
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Long Grove, IL, USA
Phone
8475411403
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,750
Expenses
$1,409
Assets
$131,581
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AL REID (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RAULIO EANES (DIRECTOR)
  • RONALD JOHNSON (DIRECTOR)
  • DEREK ROBINSON (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The foundation's primary exempt purpose is to provide scholarships to students from underrepresented racial backgrounds including african american students. Some of these scholarships will also support first-generation college studnets and students from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds.

What it reported doing in 2024

The foundation will provide scholarships to students from underrepresented racial backgrounds including african american students. Some of these scholarships will also support first-generation college students and students from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. The foundation received gifts of $20,475 in 2022 and provided $1,000 scholarships to four students totaling $4,000.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 89
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 29.7%; rating input score 30
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 70.3%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 93.39; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 37.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -86.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 29.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.