Delhi Thrift Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
800839069
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Ripon, CA, USA
Phone
2095992202
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Thrift Shops
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$47,403
Expenses
$54,361
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID SQUIBB (President)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID SQUIBB (President)
  • ELAINE VANDER VEEN (Treasurer)
  • JIM GRASLEY (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The exempt purpose of Delhi Thrift is to serve the community of Delhi in the following four ways: 1. Socially by being a place for people to volunteer, do community service and learn job skills. 2. Ecologically by reselling or recycling used items rather than putting them in the trash. 3. Financially by creating jobs, providing inexpensive items to the communtiy and bringing some revenue into the church so we can continue to do this type of service. 4. Spiritually by doing good deeds which glorify God and build relationships of trust and respect among community members.

What it reported doing in 2017

Delhi Thrift is organized to serve the community (1) Socially by being a place for people to volunteer, do community service, and learn )job skills. (2) Ecologically by reselling or recycling used items.(3) Financially by creating jobs and providing inexpensive items to the community(4) Spiritually by doing good deeds which glorify God and build relationships of trust and respect among community member.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14.7%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10.4% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $54K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2013 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.