Delaware Valley Health Care Coalition

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232813763
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2156767940
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Labor Unions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,186,239
Expenses
$900,051
Assets
$2,753,619
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EDWARD FOX (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • JACK GAITTENS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (P))
  • JOHN HEENAN (PRESIDENT)
  • RAY CONVERY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JAMES J MANION JR (DIRECTOR OF ORGANIZING): $147,024 total reported compensation
  • JOHN HEENAN (PRESIDENT): $104,981 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Delaware valley health care coalition, inc. (dvhcc) is a voluntary association comprised of union health & welfare and pension funds. The dvhcc was primarily founded to ensure quality service health care and to control and reduce health care costs through deep discount mass purchasing, while allowing each health & welfare and pension fund to stay autonomous, and to ensure the availability of innovative, quality health care, insurance, financial and affinity delivery systems for participants of the plans and their beneficiaries. The dvhcc thus ensures a better way of life for our union members and their families, and allows our union employers to be competitive with their non-union counterparts, thereby facilitating, in turn, an increase to the number of union rank and file members.

What it reported doing in 2024

During the year, the corporation supported and assisted the efforts of employee benefit plans in pooling their common interests, efforts, and purchasing power in an effort to effectively manage healthcare and certain administrative costs and to provide related education.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.06; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 28%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $147K · 13 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $190K reported
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.