Delaware Union Contractors Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832370278
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Wilmington, DE, USA
- Phone
- 3026548039
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $95,266
- Expenses
- $63,667
- Assets
- $103,046
- Liabilities
- $350
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN E HEALY IV (PRESIDENT)
- ANTHONY BROWN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN E HEALY IV (PRESIDENT)
- ANTHONY BROWN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- GREG FUTAW (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Delaware union contractors association's mission and purpose is to assist and promote the collective interests of the union contractor and to facilitate and coordinate the activities that enhance the union construction industry in the state of Delaware. Duca will work with all governmental bodies, agencies, boards, owners, construction managers, general contractors, trade unions and other union construction associations in representing the interest of union contractors in the state. The organization will strive to improve safety, productivity, training and quality of work while promoting a high ethical standard for the advancement of the construction industry in Delaware. In addition, the organization will serve as the voice in Delaware as a union contractor. The organization believes their collaborative efforts in promoting uinon construction in the state will not only improve businesses, but will improve the industry as a whole in Delaware.
What it reported doing in 2024
Market the benefits of union construction in the state of Delaware. Cultivate relationships with their labor partners and work together to control costs to allow the expansion and growth of busniess. Be a valuable resource for elected officials in formulating public policy that involves construction and development. Be a partner with the state to promote Delaware and its economic opportunities for companies looking to relocate. Also, to promote and train the next generation of trade workers utilizing state of the art training centers and apprenticeship programs, and developing the safest work environments with the most highly trained and qualified workforce in the state.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.8%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.2%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.62; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 49.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $64K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.