Delaware Seaside Railroad Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 205762923
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Ocean View, DE, USA
- Phone
- 3029451627
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Museum, Museum Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $81,671
- Expenses
- $48,740
- Assets
- $97,465
- Liabilities
- $125
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- John C Hodges (President)
- Joseph Dougherty (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- John C Hodges (President)
- Joseph Dougherty (Vice President)
- Robert Schadewald (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
As stated in DSRC's by-laws: Promote and perserve the history and hobby of model railroading. This is accomplished through the exchange of information, development of relationships, and interaction with the community through train meets, shows, displays, workshops, and presentations. Our purpose is to contnuously educate the public about model railroading - past, present and future.Each year DSRC is visible to the public throuh attendance at parades and public events. The clubhouse houses over 5 operating train layouts in different gauges and is open to the public. Workshops are held to encourage young and old to develop an interest and appreciation of this amazing hobby which has been part of the public landscape for over 100 years. Workshops are hands on to teach skills necessary to build, wire and maintain layouts.DSRC is an all-volunteeer workforce. Members build, modify and maintain all the club's permenant and travelling train layouts, maintain our facilities and interact with th
What it reported doing in 2025
Service to the public: one of our most important service programs is keeping our club open to the public as scheduled on wednesday and saturday (and other times by appointmeent). Visitors see the operating layouts in operation, interact with members, and seek advice and help on matters regarding the hobby. We have magazines and other publications generally free to the public. We also have layouts for children to operate and touch for their experimentation with trains. We get donations from visitors and new members. Over the years we have held classes for school-age groupsss on how to build a layout hands-on. The public can also bring their trains and equpment in for testing and troubleshooting.donations from estates and individuals of trains and equipment, layouts and collections are sold to generate revenues to sustain operations and programs. The club is open to members for cleaning, maintreance of layouts and all the chores necessary to keep the club open.this effort id labor intensive and all time is volunteered by members. The best estimate of costs include an allocation of occuoancy costs based on time spent and space occupied. Usually there are 12 or more members present on wednesday and saturday alone. We estimate 4000 hours are expended and related occupancy costs and maintreance of layouts are estimated at $7,052.the collective activities described in lines 28 - 30 attract vistors, inquiries and financial support necessary to sustain dsrc operations and programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.7%; rating input score 40
- Program expense ratio: 65.4%; rating input score 65
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40.3%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 48.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.7% of revenue deployed · 65.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $32K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.