Crozer Health

Legal name: Delaware County Memorial Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
230517130
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2014
Official website data refreshed
Aug 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2014
Location
Upland, PA, US
Phone
610-447-2336
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$168,635,497
Expenses
$167,784,136
Assets
$121,606,194
Liabilities
$111,977,539

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT HAFFEY (PRESIDENT TAYLOR HOSP & DCMH)
  • STEPHEN P SULLIVAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, FDNS)
  • WILLIAM MCCUNE TERM 022614 (FORMER PRESIDENT, DCMH)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOAN K RICHARDS (DIRECTOR - ASST. TREASURER): $1,233,481 total reported compensation
  • PATRICK J GAVIN (DIRECTOR - EVP/COO): $694,379 total reported compensation
  • PHILIP J RYAN CPA (ASST TREASURER - SVP/CFO): $588,593 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

At Crozer Health, we provide care to everyone who comes to us for health care, regardless of their ability to pay for services.

What it reported doing in 2014

The organization is an affiliate of the crozer-keystone health system; a tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system. Expenses (direct only; not including indirect) are incurred in providing medically necessary emergency room healthcare services in a non-discriminatory manner regardless of race, color, creed, sex, national origin, religion or ability to pay. Please refer to schedule o for the organization's community benefit statement.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 61
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.9%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 73.3%; rating input score 73; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.92; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.1%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 89.9% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $151M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 24 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $11.9M reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2009 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.