Dekalb Regional Health System Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 582034958
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- Decatur Raod, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4045015213
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- University or Technological Institute
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,262,398
- Expenses
- $2,029,572
- Assets
- $29,411,654
- Liabilities
- $28,434,014
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Robert Wilson (DMC President/CEO/VICE CHAIRMAN)
Highest reported compensation
- Dane Henry (DMC COO): $420,680 total reported compensation
- Michael Quinones MD (director): $404,960 total reported compensation
- JOHN KATISIANIS (EVP & CFO (through 8/16)): $326,602 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dekalb regional health system, inc. ("drhs") is organized to provide support to or for the benefit of dekalb medical center, inc. And decatur health resources, inc.
What it reported doing in 2016
Drhs, through the dekalb medical auxiliary, operates the dogwood gift shop located in the main lobby on the 1st floor of dekalb medical at north decatur. Drhs also operates the magnolian gift shop, located in the main lobby at dekalb medical hillandale. The shops are operated for the covenience of dekalb medical center patients and their friends and family. Proceeds from the gift shops benefit the dekalb medica foundation.drhs is accredited by the medical association of Georgia to provide continuing medical education (cme) for physicians. Drhs hosts several conferences per month on various health topics. Cme is provided for the benefit of dekalb medical staff.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 82% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 42.7%; rating input score 43
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 69.2%; rating input score 69; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 61.4%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.49; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.97; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.7%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -36.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 42.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 13 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $421K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2009 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.