Defense Industrial Base Information Sharing and Analysis Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473088550
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2017
Forms available
Form 990 2017
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2029303510
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,052,331
Expenses
$1,436,174
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CARLOS P KIZZEE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • WAYNE L BOLINE (CHAIRMAN)
  • MICHAEL A GORDON (VICE CHAIRMAN)
  • JEFFREY L TROY (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission statement of the defense industrial base information sharing and analysis organization (dib-isao), in collaboration with u.s. Government partners and the aerospace and defense industry is to facilitate voluntary collaboration and information sharing among government and private industry to gather, analyze and share information on vulnerabilities, threats and intrusions; enhance the ability of the defense industrial base (dib) sector to prepare for, respond to and mitigate risk due to cyber threats, vulnerabilities and incidents; and to serve as the primary cyber incident communications channel for the sector.

What it reported doing in 2017

The mission statement of the dib-isao, in collaboration with u.s. Government partners and the aerospace and defense industry is to facilitate voluntary collaboration and information sharing among government and private industry to gather, analyze and share information on vulnerabilities, threats and intrusions; enhance the ability of the defense industrial base (dib) sector to prepare for, respond to and mitigate risk due to cyber threats, vulnerabilities and incidents; and to serve as the primary cyber incident communications channel for the sector.the dib-isao shall:-exchange information and assessments of: -threats and incidents affecting the software/hardware elements of the dib and dod; -vulnerabilities; -remedies; and -consequent risks to the dib and dod critical infrastructure-develop strategies to mitigate the risk of cyber threatsthe mission aligns with the february 2015 presidential executive order 13691 - promoting private sector cyber security information sharing to enhance the ability of dib companies and suppliers to protect and defend dib intellectual property and business operations internationally. Since 2008, the dsie has facilitated trusted collaboration among dib cyber security experts to include information security analyst & responder training with cutting edge cyber monitoring, response, & mitigation processes. Incident response, incident management, security metrics, and the benefits of overall dib situational awareness identifies trends, both individually, and as a whole allowing for the rapid analysis of many disparate data sources and functions with actionable real-time intelligence for the overall dib-isao ecosystem and members' diverse computing environments. The dib-isao operates an analyst portal for real time indicator sharing and analysis and sponsors twice a year analyst technical exchanges. These cyber dissemination techniques and tools have proven successful in educating cyber warriors and protecting the dib critical infrastructure.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 33.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -100% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2015 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.