Deer Creek Band Booster Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831123663
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Edmond, OK, USA
- Phone
- 2484592733
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $389,850
- Expenses
- $362,731
- Assets
- $147,228
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FRANCIS BAMPOE (PRESIDENT)
- ERIC WILSON (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- FRANCIS BAMPOE (PRESIDENT)
- ERIC WILSON (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- LORI FAGAN (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Organizations primary exempt purpose - The mission and purpose of the Deer Creek Band Booster Association is to provide additional financial, organizational and moral support for the band activities and programs of the Deer Creek School District Band programs. The support shall extend to all grade levels where band is offered. Specifically, the support shall include providing organizational, leadership and functional support for all band activities; Facilitating fund raising events to support the programs and activities of the band; Creating an inclusive atmosphere open to all band families in order to generate full membership involvement; Promoting the Deer Creek Band within the Deer Creek School District and the surrounding communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Deer Creek High School Marching Band and Color Guard support in staff, performance, design, copyrights, clothing, traveling expenses, and equipment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 75.2%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 31.7% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 29.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70% of revenue deployed · 75.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $273K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.