Dedicate to Graduate Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841202906
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Lone Tree, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3036912345
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $372
- Expenses
- $38,000
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- COLLEEN KNOLL (CHAIRMAN)
- STEVE FERRERO (TREASURY/SECRETARY)
- TODD MARKSBERRY (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Purpose of dedicate to graduate: in an effort to assist canvas credit union (canvas) members pursue their goals of higher education, dedicate to graduate has created a scholarship program for selected individuals to attend institutions of higher education. To assist canvas in their pursuit of supporting the communities they serve, dedicate to graduate will support canvas's community scholarship program, which recognizes the community and academic achievements of individuals within canvas's branch communities.
What it reported doing in 2019
Dedicate to graduate awards two scholarships of $5,000 each. One for a high school senior and one for a college student. Dedicate to graduate also awards a community scholarship of $1,000 per student in each of canvas credit union's branch communities. Four of these students, are nominated and receive an additional community leadership award of $500, and one of the students receives an additional community leadership award of $5,000.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10,115.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -10.3% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -100.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -58.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $38K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2016 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.