Decatur County Girls Softball Assn
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272691314
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Greensburg, IN, USA
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Baseball, Softball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $31,066
- Expenses
- $10,711
- Assets
- $43,855
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sean Mang (President)
- Jim Wall (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Sean Mang (President)
- Jim Wall (Vice President)
- Katie Wall (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Decatur County Girls Mission Statement: Our mission is to empower young girls through the sport of softball by providing a safe supportive and inclusive environment where they can develop athletic skills build self-confidence and learn valuable life lessons. We are committed to promoting teamwork leadership and sportsmanship while fostering a sense of community and personal growth. Through our programs we aim to create opportunities for girls to engage in physical activity make lifelong friendships and develop into confident strong and positive leaders both on and off the field. Youth Softball Leagues: We organized and facilitated recreational softball leagues for girls ages 5 to 18 ensuring that players of all skill levels had the opportunity to participate. Coaching Clinics and Training: To ensure high-quality instruction and mentorship for our athletes we hosted coaching clinics for volunteer coaches.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community Engagement and Volunteer Programs: We hosted several community outreach events including free youth clinics and softball workshops aimed at introducing the sport to new participants. Our volunteer programs also involved parents and community members in supporting league operations fostering a sense of shared responsibility and community involvement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 8
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 4.8%; rating input score 5
- Program expense ratio: 14%; rating input score 14
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 65.5%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.09; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 4.8% of revenue deployed · 14% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.