Dear God Are We There Yet

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
853330740
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Ormond Beach, FL, USA
Phone
9548046244
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Personal Social Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,061
Expenses
$5,645
Assets
$17,856
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALICIA SANCHEZ (CEO/OWNER)

People named in this filing

  • ALICIA SANCHEZ (CEO/OWNER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A Volunteer Community that connects people globally to communities and causes to make an impact through volunteering.

What it reported doing in 2025

Is to provide quality vluntering services to the community. our goal and mission is connect people troughout volunteering services within the community. We listen to local peoples needs, dreams and plans. Then, we mobilize volunteers to work hand-in-hand with them on their communitys vision to serve youth and families. We have added over 5000 Virtual volunteer opptunities for over 1000 non profits worldwide. We created a community microgrant to launch 2021. Impact Microgrant will serve as another way of supporting social impact. We will provide funds, volunteers, tools, and resources to assist others in supporting, advocating, and empowering social impact. We have launched our Impact Connect Volunteer program for employers. A Custom Web Portal for User Access for Employees. We build and maintain a customized web portal and match them to opportunities Impact Connect is a unique program that has numerous benefits for the organizations, including the chance for employees to apply their benefits for the organizations, including the chance for employees to apply their productive.

Operating model

Revenue model
Affiliate-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 49%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.16; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 71.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 1 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.