Deaflead
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431688120
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Columbia, MO, USA
- Phone
- 5734455005
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,313,064
- Expenses
- $16,833,351
- Assets
- $6,217,929
- Liabilities
- $1,112,473
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR STEPHANIE LOGAN (CEO)
- PATRICIA MCKENDRY GARCIA (President)
- HANS LIEDTKE (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- DR STEPHANIE LOGAN (CEO): $231,784 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide crisis intervention, advocacy, counseling, interpreting, wellness activities, and other direct services for deaf, hard of hearing, late-deafened, deafblind, deafdisabled, and deaf+ victims/survivors and their families.
What it reported doing in 2024
Providing mental health services for deaf victims of crime and their families including deaf victims of domestic violence, child abuse, sexual assault and rape. Our services included crisis intervention, advocacy, case management, free outpatient counseling, programming for deaf teens to educate them about substance use prevention and leadership skills and 24-hour crisis videophone and chat/text services that are provided to deaf, hard of hearing, deafblind, late-deafened and hearing individuals and their families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.5%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 93%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $206.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.1%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.4%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 34.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 34.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 35.5% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.5% of revenue deployed · 93% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $232K · 10 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.