Deaconess Vna Plus Llc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 465223267
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Evansville, IN, USA
- Phone
- 8124253561
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Home Health Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,600,985
- Expenses
- $5,244,781
- Assets
- $15,848,451
- Liabilities
- $4,406,004
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES PORTER MD (DIRECTOR & PRESIDENT OF DH)
Highest reported compensation
- JAMES PORTER MD (DIRECTOR & PRESIDENT OF DH): $1,260,538 total reported compensation
- MARC J FLORENCE (DIRECTOR & SENIOR VP, DHS): $907,337 total reported compensation
- APRIL TOELLE DO (SECRETARY): $455,919 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Deaconess vna plus, a non-profit agency serving the community, is committed to the belief that every individual deserves care and support to preserve independence, dignity, and quality of life. Deaconess vna plus dedicates itself to this belief.
What it reported doing in 2024
Hospice - the organization provides hospice services in the home or in a nursing facility to those persons wishing to remain in a familiar environment during their final days, providing comfort and peace to patients and families thorugh a staff of registered nurses, medical social workers, aide and other professionals. The organization also provides the option of services in its seven-bed inpatient facility and other facilities including deaconess hospital for those persons who can no longer be adequately cared for at home.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 32
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.9%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 79.6%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.02; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.3%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -12.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.9% of revenue deployed · 79.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $290K reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 33 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.