De La Salle Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431932840
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022
Location
St Louis, MO, USA
Phone
3145319820
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Primary, Elementary Schools

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$66,492
Expenses
$488,475
Assets
$5,655,998
Liabilities
$1,178,761

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHEAL HALL (ACTING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • MARCIA SULLIVAN (BOARD MEMBER)
  • BRAD PHILLIPS (TREASURER)
  • PHIL TOBEN (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

De la salle, inc. Is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to supporting la salle charter schools, inc. And enhancing the educational experience of its students in st. Louis, Missouri.

What it reported doing in 2022

De la salle, inc. Is a non-profit dedicated to supporting la salle middle school and enhancing the educational experience of its students. La salle middle school is a public charter school located at 1106 n. Jefferson in north st. Louis city. A comprehensive graduate support program featuring act/sat prep classes, college visits, tuition assistance, are all provided to la salle students free of charge. De la salle, inc. Also works to provide students at la salle with modern, safe and convenient facilities for them to best learn. Our work serves our larger vision of excellence in educational opportunity for all. Our mission, in collaboration with la salle middle school, is to transform children and our community through innovative education.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 71% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 31%; rating input score 31
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -634.6%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.58; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10.9% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 31% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $152K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.