De La Salle Educational Center Dba Trung Tam Giao Duc La San
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 934657960
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Cypress, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2818947756
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development – Religious Leadership
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $149,599
- Expenses
- $86,450
- Assets
- $111,758
- Liabilities
- $33
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Sr AnhLoan Therese Do (Director)
- Ca Thi Do (Secretary)
- Olivia Thanh Vu (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Spiritual Sanctuary: Providing a dedicated, sacred space where individuals can freely pursue their religious beliefs, deepen their spiritual vows, and engage in lifelong devotion.-Community & Cultural Traditions: Delivering vital community services rooted in faith, including pastoral prayer support, traditional chanting during funeral proceedings, and informal classes to educate members on Catholic teachings.-Educational Enrichment: Championing the next generation by providing tailored educational programs for Vietnamese children and offering essential financial supplements to reinforce the school's budget.
What it reported doing in 2025
Our ministry in Texas deepens its impact by providing a sacred sanctuary where Catholic Nuns can fully pursue their religious beliefs, offering essential community and cultural services such as funeral prayers, traditional chanting, and informal Catholic faith classes for members, and sustaining vital educational programs for Vietnamese children alongside critical school budget supplements.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.8%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.2%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.29; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $86K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.