De La Salle Education Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 430971728
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Kansas City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 8165614445
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,537,617
- Expenses
- $4,946,890
- Assets
- $4,948,461
- Liabilities
- $531,244
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SEAN STALLING (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SEAN STALLING (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $206,995 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Delasalle high school students will courageously pursue extraordinary opportunities and support one another in their quests for success post-graduation.
What it reported doing in 2024
Delasalle education center seeks to address the significant life barriers of Kansas city's most underserved urban youth seeking life-long success through a personalized and rigorous course of study, holistic network services and workforce development. Since its inception, delasalle has based its program model on three primary ingredients for student success: (1) academic classes that are small, rigorous and personalized, (2) holistic support services such as mental health therapy that provides on-site interventions and address students' life barriers and (3) workforce development training that is integrated into everyday learning like through delasalle's award-winning printing program. Most recently, delasalle also serves the students housed in the jackson county juvenile detention center. Delasalle has served more than 12,000 students. Nearly all these young people have experienced significant success while enrolled at delasalle, as measured through multiple variables. These include student and graduate satisfaction, enriched sense of student hope, academic gains, attendance gains, increased retention in school, improved graduation rates and evidence of career and post-secondary success. From its founding, delasalle has employed a comprehensive and individualized approach to help young people. More than any other characteristic of the program's effectiveness, students have consistently reported deep satisfaction in receiving such personalized and holistic services. The belief in the value of delasalle's services on the part of its student body, and the desire to remain in delasalle even in the face of sometimes overwhelming personal and familial problems, has been, and continues to be, the foundational element for all student success. Reports of student satisfaction were instrumental in the dissemination of delasalle's program model throughout the country from 1989 to 1993. At the time, the united states department of education found delasalle to be "a program of convincing effectiveness" that improved student self-esteem and satisfaction and funded its replication and dissemination in over seventy sites during that period.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 93% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.5%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 67.3%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: $147.97 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.2%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.5% of revenue deployed · 67.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $207K · 8 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $227K reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.