Ddmba Nj Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 010675309
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017
- Location
- Edison, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 7322491898
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hinduism
- Affiliation
- Hinduism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $292,167
- Expenses
- $171,633
- Assets
- $2,886,618
- Liabilities
- $1,000,767
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
People named in this filing
- HUNG-JEN YU (DIRECTOR)
- TSAI CHIN SHUN (DIRECTOR)
- NAN-JUN YU (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Religion & education
What it reported doing in 2017
Community programs: providing prayer services, meditation practice, meals, events and classes (including shuilu ceremony, water repent praying services, earth buddha praying services and grateful market activities)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 7
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 58
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 6.2%; rating input score 6
- Program expense ratio: 10.5%; rating input score 11
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.3%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 16.82; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 6.2% of revenue deployed · 10.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $18K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.