Dcis Understood Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
994323785
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Cold Spring, NY, USA
Phone
9172323329
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Breast Cancer

Reported finances

Revenue
$37,412
Expenses
$8,943
Assets
$37,469
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JULIA STALDER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JULIA STALDER (PRESIDENT)
  • ASHLEY LITWIN DIEGO (DIRECTOR)
  • SHIRA WEISSMAN (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Dcis understood is a volunteer-led 501(c)(3) public charity founded in 2024 by a patient advocate. The organization's mission is to increase awareness and knowledge of ductal carcinoma in situ (dcis) and to accelerate dcis research through education, advocacy, and funding. Dcis is a non-invasive breast condition, often referred to as stage 0 breast cancer, diagnosed in approximately 60,000 individuals in the united states each year. Despite its prevalence, patients frequently receive limited information at diagnosis and face complex, time-sensitive treatment decisions with little patient-centered guidance available. Dcis understood was founded to close that information gap and to give patients and their families a trusted, independent source of education and support.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization operates a single integrated program that serves dcis patients, their families, clinicians, and the general public through three coordinated activities. Education: the organization publishes free, evidence-based educational content including diagnosis explainers, treatment overviews, frequently asked questions, and plain-language summaries of emerging clinical research reviewed for accuracy by a volunteer advisory council of breast oncologists, surgeons, and researchers. Advocacy: the organization raises public awareness of dcis, promotes informed shared decision-making between patients and their clinicians, and works to elevate the patient voice in research and policy priorities. Support: the organization provides coping resources and curated referrals to support communities for individuals navigating a dcis diagnosis. These activities are delivered primarily through the organization's public website (dcisunderstood.org) and through partnerships with clinicians, researchers, and patient communities.during the tax year, dcis understood launched its public educational platform at dcisunderstood.org and reached approximately 2,200 new users from the united states and nine other countries seeking information about dcis. The organization convened a volunteer advisory council of seven breast-cancer clinicians and researchers; published a patient education brochure for newly diagnosed individuals in both english and spanish; launched a blog on the organization's website and published 20 educational articles and research summaries; launched a quarterly e-newsletter, growing the subscriber base to 200; began development of an integrated ai assistant designed to answer common patient questions about dcis directly on the website; and established a social media strategy and initiated its rollout to expand the organization's reach. In addition, the organization attended the san antonio breast cancer symposium and the annual breast cancer symposium in hudson, ny, which yielded numerous partnerships and professional connections; participated in a widely followed podcast; was featured in an article in cure magazine; and launched a coordinated fundraising strategy designed to engage individual donors, foundations, and corporate partners; all contributions received during the tax year came from individual donors. All program work was performed by volunteers, including the founder and board of directors; the organization had no paid staff during the tax year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 17.7%; rating input score 18
  • Program expense ratio: 74.2%; rating input score 74

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 76.1%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.19; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 17.7% of revenue deployed · 74.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.