DCHS Tigers Cheer Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
863834670
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Douglasville, GA, USA
Phone
6782718633
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$43,709
Expenses
$24,821
Assets
$20,536
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Nicola Dawkins (President)
  • Kristina Minott (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Nicola Dawkins (President)
  • Kristina Minott (Vice President)
  • Sharon Singleton (Financial Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The main exempt purpose of our cheer booster club is to support and promote the activities, welfare, and development of Douglas County High School's cheerleading program. This can include: Fundraising: Raising money to support the cheerleading team with uniforms, equipment, travel expenses, competition fees, and other related costs. Community Engagement: Encouraging community involvement and support for the cheerleading program, fostering school spirit, and building positive relationships between students, families, and the community. Support and Assistance: Providing financial or organizational support to the cheer team and its members to help with training, events, and any other resources that might be needed to enhance the program's success.

What it reported doing in 2024

We fundraised for our team needs. We helped covered uniforms, warm-ups and practice gear. We helped purchased team supplies. We organized team bonding events to help boost team morale. We coordinated with the school and local businesses to create events for our cheer team surrounding out football and basketball teams.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.8%; rating input score 57
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 43.2%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.