Dcac Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
383852801
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Alexandria, VA, USA
Phone
3016549000
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$147,500
Expenses
$107,899
Assets
$49,261
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL M CANNON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL M CANNON (PRESIDENT)
  • JARED HYMAN (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The dcac fosters and promotes the sport of amateur wrestling at all age levels in the domestic & international styles of wrestling through clinics (one day teaching seminars), camps (multiple date teaching and competition gatherings) and competition-level tournaments. The dcac supports training within the three disciplines of wrestling (freestyle, folkstyle or collegiate discipline, and grecoroman or olympic discipline). Many successful professionals have attributed their success to the work ethic and dedication that they learned while in the sport of amateur wrestling. The dcac will provide opportunities for future generations of athletes to experience and benefit from the skills, dedication and discipline required in wrestling.

What it reported doing in 2024

Sponsor athletes in competition by providing coaching support fortraining, travel expenses, promote community wrestling events

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.8%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.46; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $108K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.