Dc2 Culture Committee Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
995148421
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Chandler, AZ, USA
Phone
4083554128
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Dance

Reported finances

Revenue
$30,695
Expenses
$11,265
Assets
$24,265
Liabilities
$73

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • VANESSA MICHELE THOMAS (President)

People named in this filing

  • VANESSA MICHELE THOMAS (President)
  • KRISTA ANN CALCAGNO (Secretary)
  • CARSEN HELENE FIELD (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

DC2 Culture Committee, Inc. promotes, educates and supports the development of youth through the amateur sport of dance. We aim to celebrate the achievements of youth dancers by creating an accessible and affordable opportunity for youth dancers to express their creativity through the transformative power of dance. With participation in local, regional and national competitions, in dance classes, in volunteer opportunities and in other community and team building activities, DC2 Culture Committee, Inc. strives to help young dancers grow into empowered adult women and adult men, realizing their greatest future potential.

What it reported doing in 2025

Gave dozens of young, promising, dancers the ability to continue their dream of competing in local, regional and national competitions.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 100% of its reported program spending for member benefits.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 24%; rating input score 24
  • Program expense ratio: 65.4%; rating input score 65

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 63.3%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.15; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 107.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 130.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 24% of revenue deployed · 65.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.