Dayton Workforce Partnerships

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272865672
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Miamisburg, OH, USA
Phone
9372397969
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$70,080
Expenses
$289,977
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RON F ADLER (PRESIDENT)
  • DORIS J ADLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & TREAS)

People named in this filing

  • RON F ADLER (PRESIDENT)
  • DORIS J ADLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & TREAS)
  • ARLENE SETZER (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To retain college talent in dayton after graduation

What it reported doing in 2022

In 2022, dwp continued its scholarship program for colleges, universities, and high schools, awarding $20,000 in scholarship funds.in december 2021, dwp received a $100,000 unrestricted contribution. The board recommended utilizing those funds to support charitable organizations in greater dayton. Our focus was to identify charities that provide services to needy adults, children and veterans. We visited and interviewed 20 organizations to confirm that their mission aligned with the dwp vision. A "grant request application" was developed and the board of directors determined the final selection of organizations to receive a donation at its march 29, 2022 meeting. All funds were distributed upon dissolution as reported on schedule n.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 66% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 3
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -313.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 28.5%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 38.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.4% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $241K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.