Dayton Raiders Swim Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311443137
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Beavercreek, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9374304239
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Swimming & Other Water Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $541,655
- Expenses
- $555,206
- Assets
- $326,682
- Liabilities
- $142,903
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CRAIG GASKILL (PRESIDENT)
- KRIS COOPER (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- AMBER MUSTER (BOARD MEMBER)
- PAM LINK (TREASURER)
- JERRY WEBB (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The dayton raiders swim club, inc. Is committed to excellence and is dedicated to developing world-class citizens and world-class athletes. The dayton raiders swim club is an instructional and competitive swim program with the purpose and commitment to: teach and develop life.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided instructional and competitive swimming opportunities for 200 aged primarily from 6 to 18 years of age. Training groups are offered beginning with 5-8 year old increasing in age and ability to our senior level group, which are primarily high school aged students. The dayton raiders swim club employ an experienced, highly qualified coaching staff who are focused on developing well balanced student athletes. Many swimmers in our program excel in the classroom as well as in the pool and continue swimming through college on academic and athletic scholarships. Swimmers participate in various meets, from local to national championships. Many of our swimmers also represent their high schools through participation on school swim teams.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.9%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 96.4%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.5%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.9% of revenue deployed · 96.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $535K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.