Dayspring Outreach Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200016867
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Joplin, MO, USA
- Phone
- 4174378509
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $482,657
- Expenses
- $466,032
- Assets
- $227,061
- Liabilities
- $3,714
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Roger Tomlinson (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Roger Tomlinson (President): $28,430 total reported compensation
- Whitney Thetge (Admin. Assistant): $6,550 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advance the gospel of Christ to Mexico through missionary support, humanitarian works and children's homes, native church building and support, evangelism, and other ministries. To increase a vision in Americans and the American churches through short term mission experiences, on site training, mission services, presentations, and conferences.
What it reported doing in 2024
Missionary Support and Training - Dayspring currently provides support for 3 full time American missionaries and their families located in Mexico and the United States. They are involved in various types of ministries and works throughout Mexico and the USA, including children's ministries, pastoral and evangelistic ministries, humanitarian works, training and many others. Dayspring operates a seven-month missionary training school to prepare individuals from the USA and Latin America for ministry service as music ministers, pastors, and full-time missionaries. In the school, students learn basic discipleship, theology, languages, first aid and emergency medical training, health and missionary survival. The students are prepared through classroom training and hands on practice. Our students have gone on to become missionaries, pastors, youth and worship leaders, and other ministers in both the USA, Mexico, the Caribbean, and Latin America.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.8%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 95%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $49.67 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Pass
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.4%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.8% of revenue deployed · 95% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $443K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $28K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.