Daya International
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832675394
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Littleton, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3033235696
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International, Foreign Affairs, and National Security N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $147,087
- Expenses
- $125,181
- Assets
- $185,266
- Liabilities
- $186
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Vaun Swanson (Board Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Vaun Swanson (Board Vice President)
- Anne Coughlin (Executive Officer)
- Mandy Anderson (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Daya International's mission is to provide educational opportunities for marginalized women and youth in Nepal.
What it reported doing in 2024
Girls and Tech Training - The GTT initiative reached 118 girls this past year from grades 8 through 11 at 2 different government schools! The program successfully achieved the goal of empowering young girls in rural Nepal to confidently utilize computer skills. They learned how to use basic operation, skill of keyboard and programming concepts. Daya International also purchased and donated 5 computers to one of these rural schools, to support their continued technological learning. Art therapy sessions were also introduced at the elementary and middle school level, at the same school sites, with 50 students (both boys and girls) participating.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.1%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 76.7%; rating input score 77
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.9%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.48; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.8%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 32.9% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.1% of revenue deployed · 76.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $96K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.