Day One Relief

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
862505512
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Durham, NC, USA
Phone
9193603864
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,573,406
Expenses
$886,731
Assets
$1,687,133
Liabilities
$200

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jil Christensen (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Jil Christensen (PRESIDENT/CEO): $10,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Day One Relief rapidly responds to the critical needs of marginalized communities and people, building resilient, long-term solutions.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, Day One Relief provided large-scale logistical and material support to communities impacted by Hurricane Helene. We supplied partner organizations across western North Carolina with critical resources including generators, communication devices, MREs, water, tools, cash assistance, food, adult incontinence supplies, diapers, OTC, first aid and water sanitation systems. These efforts supported frontline communities and local organizations operating as emergency relief hubs. Our team facilitated aviation based emergency transport for emergency room doctors and nurses to hospitals that were inaccessible by road as well as initial transport of needed relief supplies by air until the roads opened up. Following Hurricane Helene, numerous community groups transformed into neighborhood-based disaster relief hubs. Day One Relief provided ongoing logistics, procurement, transportation, warehousing, and distribution support to ensure these hubs had the resources necessary to meet urgent needs. We also coordinated the movement of donated goods from large organizations into affected communities and ensured equitable distribution through trusted local partners. Day One Relief served as a connector between national relief organizations, private-sector donors, and grassroots community partners responding to Hurricane Helene. We matched large-scale donations with on-the-ground needs, expedited the flow of critical supplies, and provided technical assistance to local organizations adapting their operations for emergency response.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 33.8%; rating input score 34
  • Program expense ratio: 98.2%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6,772.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 65.5%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.9; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 45.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -17.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 119% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 33.8% of revenue deployed · 98.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $848K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $10K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.